Connected Situation / Through 2026-09-26

Hurricanes Polo and Nolo: Mexico and Hawaii

stories
5
events
2
entities
28
connections
5
Retained edition
Evidence so far on 2026-09-26 UTC · updated 2026-09-26 14:25 UTC · analysis as of 2026-09-26 04:24 UTCSign in for the live Situation ↗
Narrative

As-of analysis

Carried forward
Situation at a glance

On September 25, Hurricane Polo was described as drenching Mexico’s coast while Hurricane Nolo threatened Hawaii in “Hurricane Nolo threatens Hawaii as Hurricane Polo drenches Mexico's coast”; that Story is dated September 25. On September 25, the coded Event “Hurricane Polo strengthens and prompts port closures in Mexico” links Polo to Mexico. The September 26 Story “Los Cabos closes ports as Hurricane Polo approaches” reports the closure; its linked Event, dated September 25, names Mexico’s federal port authority (Capitanía de Puerto) and Los Cabos ports. September 26 reporting continued in “Hurricane Nolo threatens Hawaii with heavy rain as Polo churns near Mexico” and “Category 5 Hurricane Polo strengthens as it heads toward Mexico and the US”; the latter’s headline reports the Category 5 characterization. The September 26 Los Cabos Story also continued reporting on the port closure.

Footnotes[4][5][2][6][1][3][9][10]
Assessment

The September 25 Story headline pairs Polo drenching Mexico’s coast with Nolo threatening Hawaii, and a September 26 Story continues that paired coverage. The port-closure Event is dated September 25, while its linked Story is dated September 26; the connection describes the closure as a precautionary response to Polo’s approach. Neither Event names Nolo as a source or target actor. The Category 5 description appears in a September 26 Story headline, not in either Event title; the Event magnitude scores are separate metrics. Capitanía de Puerto and Protección Civil Los Cabos are linked to the port-closure Story as mentions, and neither entity has a supporting Event.

Footnotes[4][1][3][5][6][11][7][8]

Explanation originally captured 2026-09-26 · Evidence through 2026-09-26 UTC · Source edition sed_5f1b9890b3caca3d9f577b011c42817e

What informs this explanation
  • Complete retained Story and Event membership
  • Daily reporting and coded-occurrence time steps
  • Event taxonomies, metrics, units, and denominators
  • Canonical Entities and recorded actor/target bindings
  • Typed reporting, membership, and incident edges
  • Changes against the preceding retained edition
  • Permitted macro, public-record, and asset facts only when they were retained with an explicit source and observation date
Quantitative

Evidence in numbers

This retained edition
  • Scope

    A 2-day Situation represented by 2 coded Events carried across 5 member Stories.

  • Coded activity

    The coded activity is led by EN02 · Meteorological Hazard (2).

  • Prominent subjects

    🇲🇽Mexico is prominent in the retained actor and relationship evidence.

  • Entity coverage

    28 canonical Entities are linked to this edition.

Metric coverage. 2 coded Events · 2 CAMEO+ · 0 conflict. The four dimensions describe the CAMEO+ subset; conflict Events do not carry these scores.

Magnitude2
min 1max 3
2 measured
Systemic importance0.13
min 0.12max 0.13
2 measured
Propagation potential0.26
min 0.25max 0.27
2 measured
Market sensitivity0.44
min 0.38max 0.5
2 measured

Dot = mean · shaded span = observed range · position uses each metric’s defined scale.

All 6 scores, distributions & definitions

How the coder scored the full retained Event set

2 coded events — 2 CAMEO+

  • Significance · 20.29
    min 0.27max 0.31
  • Magnitude · 22
    min 1max 3
  • Systemic · 20.13
    min 0.12max 0.13
  • Propagation · 20.26
    min 0.25max 0.27
  • Market · 20.44
    min 0.38max 0.5
  • Confidence · 20.72
    min 0.65max 0.78

No conflict-family event here, so nothing carries a fatality count — a missing column, not a toll of zero. 2 sit outside POLITICAL, where Goldstein and quad class are undefined.

Significance

2 measured / 2 eligible · 0 missing · 0 not applicable

score (0 to 1) · Event-level distribution, not a Situation risk score.

across all 2 events

Magnitude

2 measured / 2 eligible · 0 missing · 0 not applicable

score (0 to 10) · Event-level distribution, not a Situation risk score.

across all 2 events — every one of them CAMEO+

Systemic

2 measured / 2 eligible · 0 missing · 0 not applicable

score (0 to 1) · Event-level distribution, not a Situation risk score.

across all 2 events — every one of them CAMEO+

Propagation

2 measured / 2 eligible · 0 missing · 0 not applicable

score (0 to 1) · Event-level distribution, not a Situation risk score.

across all 2 events — every one of them CAMEO+

Market

2 measured / 2 eligible · 0 missing · 0 not applicable

score (0 to 1) · Event-level distribution, not a Situation risk score.

across all 2 events — every one of them CAMEO+

Confidence

2 measured / 2 eligible · 0 missing · 0 not applicable

score (0 to 1) · Event-level distribution, not a Situation risk score.

across all 2 events

Metric definitions and limitations

This retained edition, independent of graph and page limits. Different dimensions, not a blended risk score; reported tolls may overlap.

Day by day2 reporting days · click a day to open or close it

2026-09-26analystlatest

Reporting continues; no Event is listed for this date

September 26 reporting includes continued coverage of Nolo and Polo, a Story headline describing Polo as Category 5, and a Los Cabos port-closure Story. The September 26 timeline entry lists no Event; this absence does not establish that storm activity ceased.

4+3
Stories · vs day before
0-2
Events · vs day before
53
articles
The lay of the land

Situation timeline

Threads
All 2 daysarticlesstoriesevents
09-2509-26
Loading Situation timeline…

What kind of event · 1 coded type

over 2 coded events on this edition

  • Environment2
    • EN02 · Meteorological Hazard2

Countries · where it happened

Countries · who is acting

Salient structure

What holds this Situation together

Selected from the complete retained edition

Key threads

  1. core
    AnalystPolo near Mexico and Nolo’s reported Hawaii threat

    The September 25 Story pairs Polo’s activity near Mexico with Nolo’s threat to Hawaii, and a September 26 Story continues coverage of both storms.

    The September 25 Story pairs Polo’s activity near Mexico with Nolo’s threat to Hawaii, and a September 26 Story continues coverage of both storms.

    Footnotes[4][1]
  2. development
    AnalystLos Cabos port closure

    The Los Cabos port closure is linked as a precautionary response to Polo’s approach.

    The Los Cabos port closure is linked as a precautionary response to Polo’s approach.

    Footnotes[11][6][2]

Key actors

    Key Events

    1. contextAnalystcameoplus_0357d198e60f4878

      Dated September 25, this Event identifies Hurricane Polo as the source actor and Mexico as the target in a tropical-cyclone occurrence.

      Dated September 25, this Event identifies Hurricane Polo as the source actor and Mexico as the target in a tropical-cyclone occurrence.

      Footnotes[5]
    2. responseAnalystMexico’s port authority closes Los Cabos ports as Polo nears

      Dated September 25, this Event describes Mexico’s federal port authority (Capitanía de Puerto) closing Los Cabos ports; the closure is linked as a precautionary response to Polo’s approach.

      Dated September 25, this Event describes Mexico’s federal port authority (Capitanía de Puerto) closing Los Cabos ports; the closure is linked as a precautionary response to Polo’s approach.

      Footnotes[6][11]

    Notable connections

    Evidenced relationships involving significant participants beyond the central cast.

    1. The Event is linked to this Story, which reports Polo near Mexico and Nolo threatening Hawaii. · reporting linkAnalystcameoplus_0357d198e60f4878 → Hurricane Nolo threatens Hawaii with heavy rain as Polo churns near Mexico

      The Event lists this Story among its linked Stories.

      The Event lists this Story among its linked Stories.

      Footnotes[5][1]
    2. The Event is linked to the Story about Los Cabos closing ports as Polo approaches. · reporting linkAnalystMexico’s port authority closes Los Cabos ports as Polo nears → 2a3130753b41

      The Event lists this Story among its linked Stories.

      The Event lists this Story among its linked Stories.

      Footnotes[6][2]
    3. Capitanía de Puerto is mentioned in the Los Cabos port-closure Story; this link identifies a contextual mention, not… · reporting linkAnalystllm:2568577c0f46a059dbb3 → 2a3130753b41

      This mention is useful for identifying an authority named in the port-closure coverage, but it does not establish Event participation.

      This mention is useful for identifying an authority named in the port-closure coverage, but it does not establish Event participation.

      Footnotes[7][2]
    4. Protección Civil Los Cabos is mentioned in the port-closure Story; this does not establish Event participation. · reporting linkAnalystllm:70b835223a0721f6d770 → 2a3130753b41

      This mention is useful for identifying an organization named in the port-closure coverage, but it does not establish Event participation.

      This mention is useful for identifying an organization named in the port-closure coverage, but it does not establish Event participation.

      Footnotes[8][2]
    How a Situation is put together5 Stories · 2 Events · 5 membership connections · 38 graph edges

    A retained time step

    This edition freezes the complete served membership and analysis available through its UTC cutoff. Later repairs or identity changes do not rewrite what this edition showed.

    Stories, Events, and cast

    Stories are reporting clusters. Events are coded occurrences within that reporting. The cast contains 28 canonical people and organizations linked to the retained evidence.

    Typed connections

    Story-to-Event edges identify supporting reporting. Entity-to-Event edges identify recorded actor or target participation. Mentions and analytical roles stay visibly distinct from recorded participation.

    Core, precursor, and continuation labels organize the reading. They do not by themselves establish causation. Collapsed graph groups and paginated evidence change presentation only; counts use the complete retained edition.